GHOST
IN THE SHELL: Where is the thin line that separates man and machine?
In a
future where technology has advanced to the point where interfacing brains with
various networks is common, brain hacking has become a threat. A famous hacker
known as the Puppet Master has now infiltrated Japan, and is hacking the brains
of people to do his bidding. Now it is Motoko Kusanagi’s job to track him down,
and along the way, she discovers that there is something more about this hacker
-- and about herself.
What
I really like about Ghost in the Shell are the complex technology that holds it
together and the organizations that make its world more believable. They are
too complex and too believable perhaps, that they have the tendency to become
confusing. I appreciate it that the show treats its audience as intelligent,
but I think a little explaining could have gone a long way. The show simply
assumes that the audience already knows everything, so it doesn’t take the time
for exposition and just goes straight into the action. This is one of the
reasons why Ghost in the Shell could be pretty hard to swallow for others,
especially those who have short attention spans.
Another
thing that makes it hard to swallow is that the plot often moves through
dialogue. Important plot points are often embedded in the conversations. The
storytelling is more of ‘tell’ rather than ‘show’. I’m not saying that
dialogue-heavy shows are a chore to watch. They could still be intense, and Gen
Urobuchi’s stories prove that. But Ghost in the Shell appears to rely on it the
wrong way.
Before
you get any weird ideas, let me say that I actually love Ghost in the Shell.
There are many reasons why. First, the plot is interesting in its own right. It’s
like a cat and mouse game. Second, Motoko Kusanagi is the perfect perspective
for this interesting plot. What makes it so is, Third, the plot and the main
character blend well together to form subtle messages about humanity. When does
a man be considered a machine? And when does a machine be considered a man?
These questions wouldn’t become appropriate if the show is too plot-oriented,
or if Motoko Kusanagi has not been a main character.
Let
me explain that further. Most science fiction stories are plot-oriented,
because usually, the messages they want to convey involve humanity, society,
and how we have changed because of the decisions and actions we have made all
throughout the years. Ghost in the Shell, on the other hand, is not just
plot-oriented. It’s also about the character. This formula of storytelling is
something similar to Inception – wherein the planting of the idea in Robert
Fischer’s mind is the plot, but the main character, Cobb, has to deal with his
own ghosts while trying to move with this plot. To put it in perspective, Ghost
in the Shell is not merely about capturing Puppet Master. It is also about
Motoko Kusanagi, and how she fights her own ghosts. And this combination of
plot and characterization has resulted in the forming of subtle messages.
Another
thing I like is the animation. It is very smooth. Even the dropping and rippling
of water is majestic to look at. And the backgrounds are also very detailed. It
doesn’t rely on minimalism, and that’s a good thing, because minimalism has the
tendency to feel uninspired. The music is also good. It has its own character.
Soundtracks are actually seldom used, but I think that has been an appropriate
move to add a mature tone to the anime.
Overall,
Ghost in the Shell is an outstanding movie. Its flaw, which is actually minor
and subjective, is its immediate jumping to the action without exposition. But
that could be overlooked because everything else is just bedazzling – the story
and how it blends well with characterization, the animation, the music, and,
most of all, the philosophical messages about the humanity of humans. I’m not
surprised that this is considered a classic, because it is fairly obvious that
its inherent messages have influenced not just anime, but also science fiction
in general.
Additional
Note: I decided to check this out finally because I am reviewing Ghost in the
Shell: Arise, which is a reimagining of the franchise. You can find my first
impression of it here.
Again, I agree with most of your points about Ghost in the Shell. I think this was the second or third anime film I watched a while back and it was great, despite the few flaws. I almost wish the movie was a little longer because some parts seemed a little underdeveloped, but that is probably because those aspects were so intriguing that I wanted to see more. Since The Matrix is one of my favorite films, seeing the film that inspired it was great. Overall, the movie presented some very thought-provoking ideas. I really need to watch Standalone Complex soon.
ReplyDelete-James
The best part of it is the fact that it has been released in 1995. I mean, if you're asking questions about man and machine in an era that is not yet fully exposed to cyborgs and such, you know you're ahead of your time. It reminds me of the books by HG Wells, wherein he talks about time travel, genetic manipulation, alien invasion, and such, during the 19th century or so. These guys are just brilliant.
DeleteI'm also looking forward to SAC, but before that, I'll write a few more first impressions of 2014 winter titles. Hey, thanks for commenting on almost every post! Really appreciate it.
Exactly, the only other movie that I have seen that asks similar questions before Ghost in the Shell was Blade Runner. Most people do not even realize how much Ghost in the Shell has influenced the cyber-punk and sci-fi genre outside of anime. I also agree with your HG Wells analogy.
DeleteI am glad to comment! Your reviews are great and our opinions on a lot of anime are very similar.
-James
useful information on topics that plenty are interested on for this wonderful post.Admiring the time and effort you put into your b!.. Anime
ReplyDelete