BLIND
WILLOW, SLEEPING WOMAN: Don’t get me wrong. This book is good, but it’s not
very consistent
Blind
Willow, Sleeping Woman is a collection of twenty-four short stories by Japanese
author Haruki Murakami. The stories are translated from the Japanese by Philip
Gabriel and Jay Rubin, like other Murakami books.
Like
Murakami’s other works, this book has successfully employed a surreal
atmosphere and knack for symbolism and wordplay. It shows me the absurdity of
everyday things, and the fantastical in the ordinary. However, these traits are
rather on the overall impression of the book, for, when I look at the stories
individually, some of them seem to be lacking in these departments. I’m not
saying that some of the stories are mediocre. I just want to point out that
some of the stories are being outshined by the others, for there is no consistency
in the quality of work. This is understandable, for I really shouldn’t expect
every story to be a masterpiece. Of course, some will turn out to be better
than the others are, especially when I put into consideration that Murakami has
written these stories in different years in his writing career.
Personally,
the most impressive of these stories are the last five -- stories that have
also appeared in the book Strange Tales from Tokyo -- Birthday Girl, and The
Seventh Man. Why I find them as such is their being perfect models of the
author’s writing style. They are the works that portray Murakami’s style in its
full effectiveness, for Murakami’s ability to pull off the surreal atmosphere,
and still being able to present prose that has deeper meaning between the lines,
are present in these works. They are on a different level of quality that they
seem to overshadow other good surreal pieces like Man-Eating Cats and The Ice
Man. I’m not saying that there is a specific formula for a ‘short story’, but
these stories seem to be the ones who have the most prominent impression of ‘short
story’ in them in the collection. The reason for this is the fact that they are
not too simplistic and linear, and their foundation is complicated enough to devour
a couple of pages with real content -- just like how real short stories are.
Speaking
of this concept, some stories in this collection doesn’t present themselves as
real short stories. They are dubbed as ‘short shorts’, and, I must say, that that
is the perfect epithet. These include The Mirror, A Perfect Day for Kangaroos, Dabchick,
The Year of Spaghetti, and The Rise and Fall of Sharpie Cakes. These stories
are good in their own ways, for they have concepts that are rather dreamy, and
they have been pulled off effectively with the use of wit and wordplay. However,
they seem to be put in the shade, for they are not as good as the ‘real short
stories’ in the collection. Aside from that, the fact that these stories solely
depend on symbolism and not on the development of the plot could make them
problematic for other readers.
Other
stories in the collection that I have not mentioned yet are the stories that
don’t leave much of an impression to me. Among them, perhaps the only notable
one is Tony Takitani because the loneliness of the character has been
communicated well. I don’t mean that they are mediocre. They just seem to lack
the real magic of Murakami’s writing, and most of their plotlines are rather
nonsensical.
Overall,
I still find this to be a good collection of short stories. The main problem I
have with it is the inconsistency with the quality of work. However, when taken
as a whole, I come to realize that some of the stories are just so good that
they make up for the others, so my general impression of the book still remains
positive.
Related
posts:
No comments:
Post a Comment