THE
STRANGE CASE OF DOCTOR JEKYLL AND MISTER HYDE: A story worthy of being one of
the pillars of classic horror
Of
the three most enduring horror icons, I have only read Dracula and The Strange
Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, for I have not yet found a good hardcopy of Frankenstein.
I actually find Dracula mediocre and excessively inflated; and I have heard
from reliable sources that Frankenstein suffers from many writing problems as
well. The reason why I am saying this is that, out of the three, I think The
Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a breath of fresh air, for it
actually restores my faith on these ‘pillars of classic horror’.
This
book is about the mild-mannered Dr. Jekyll, who concocts a potion that turns
him into the loathsome Mr. Hyde. Unlike Dracula and Frankenstein, it is a very
short book. But this feature doesn’t hinder it to have good quality. If
anything, it has made the story direct to the point. The story just doesn’t turn
to unnecessary directions -- and this is always a good thing, at least for me.
The
storytelling is interesting. It effectively gives the story a suspenseful atmosphere
right from the very first chapter. This sinister air has melded well with the
mystery the book imposes, and it has been maintained all throughout. If the
story hasn’t been revealed to me automatically by society, I would have found
this mystery to be way more intriguing. I could only imagine the suspense of
turning a page to unravel the grand mystery before me.
The
writing style is also worth noting. Considering that this has been written in
1886, I am expecting a complicated sentence structure and a deep vocabulary.
Even though these are true features of the book, they have not rendered the
book hard to read. In fact, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is very
easy to read compared to other 19th century works. This, however,
does not mean that the writing is simplistic. The author just has a voice that
is not overly complicated and boring.
As
for the main character, I find him interesting, for he is very open to
psychological analysis -- and this is the real juice of the book. The book in
general tackles the idea of dual personality. It shows that even someone who is
looked up to by society, in this case, Dr. Jekyll, has his own evils inside
him, or perhaps a completely different self, as shown in the book as Mr. Hyde. Dr.
Jekyll is basically a man who has all the necessary qualifications to a worthy
Victorian life, but, deep inside, he actually wants to free himself of these
noble attributes and indulge himself with traits that are more animalistic.
This
theme has made this short book very complex, and, I must add, that there is
also a negative consequence into this. Considering the length of the work, I
find this theme to be prematurely executed. The book could have been a lot
longer to dive deeper into Dr. Jekyll’s split personality, but what I get is a
single chapter where everything is revealed. This last chapter, even though it
tackles a good POV of Dr. Jekyll, is very open to expansion. Perhaps if the
book were written in a full POV of Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde, it would have a lot
more depth.
Other
than that, I have seen no other problem with the book. I’m not saying that the
book is near to perfect, but it clearly shows itself as a work worthy of being
a classic. I could see the reason why it has surpassed the test of time.
Surely, The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, together with its themes,
will be read in many more years to come. And it will continue to fascinate
readers with the concept of the duality of man.
No comments:
Post a Comment